Critical Failures

Characters of note: Kerr Avon and Roj Blake

Posted in Uncategorized by criticalfailing on May 15, 2010

Sometimes, you just wish Blake’s 7 would pull itself the hell together.  Its own writers patronized it half the time, and the whole tone of the thing changed from season to season. Characters were rewritten weekly. The universe always seemed to be getting smaller; remote political villains became the cast’s personal adversaries, and the effects of, say, an intergalactic war didn’t seem to have much effect on daily life.

And yet it rose above this, pretty much to the point where it’s my favorite science fiction series ever. There are better shows, but there are no shows in my experience more full of interesting lacunae, melancholy atmosphere, enormous sleeves, and that special kind of camp which is inextricable from the best drama.

Paul Darrow as Avon; Gareth Thomas as Blake.

Part of its appeal is certainly its BBC-in-the-’70s patina: fantastically excessive costuming, stage actors thoughtfully gnawing on scenery with an intelligent look in their eyes, and a permanent air of sweaty, half-tearful exhaustion. There is no money. What money there was was spent on leather pants ages ago. The guns look like hair dryers. We never see a Liberator hair dryer, but presumably they look like guns.

The men wear upholstery fabric. They’re much too human even to appear on Roddenberry’s Star Trek — their bodies are emaciated or pint-softened, their faces prematurely careworn and cast, as the faces of the English Seventies often seemed to be, from molds of minor Roman emperors. The women have an exaggerated quality to their features, like silent-film queens — particularly Jan Chappell, who has bigger eyes and longer arms and thinner cheeks than anybody. These are attractive people, but you might plausibly see them at the DMV. That sets the tone somewhat.

The series is initially about a revolutionary called Roj Blake, a rebel leader bent on overthrowing the fascist Federation (name no coincidence; Blake’s 7 takes a good deal from Star Trek, but refuses to be grateful about it). In a brilliant casting, Blake is played by Gareth Thomas, an actor capable of selling the worst dialogue and elevating the best, and also a man with a powerfully complicated and malleable face. In the space of a single scene, Blake can look anything from imposing to fiery to goofy, which is important when so much of the series’ subtext depends on his companions’ inconsistent faith in him.

Blake and Orac (in the background: Zen). They had a lot of computer friends, all of them voiced by Peter Tuddenham.

The rest of the initial cast are reluctant, world-weary criminals. In such company, Blake’s revolutionary spirit sometimes comes off as bleakly compulsive and dogged. In this group, he’s the one who must account for himself — indeed, in the early episodes, being a revolutionary is his quirk, like Vila’s cowardice or Gan’s strength. While he eventually seizes the group’s hearts and minds through sheer moral gravity, there remains a lack of automatic heroism to him, and a sense even of madness.

It stems partly from Thomas’ performance, partly from the writing, and certainly partly from the episodic nature of the series, which forces Blake to wrestle with the group every week as if the last week didn’t happen, and usually to have some distracting new scheme in mind — something, anything, that will lead to actually overthrowing the government, that will allow Blake to become something more than a shallow folk hero. Blake has more than a touch of self-aggrandization in him (“We did it! I DID IT!”), but there’s something in the semi-official idea that he was originally an engineer. Totalitarianism is narrow and thus wasteful, and so are heroes, and Blake doesn’t really believe in either. It is ultimately his concrete and even somewhat plodding thought, his distaste for the Federation, that makes him a good revolutionary, one who knows the dangers of getting caught up in the drama and hype.

One example of the Federation’s fundamental wastefulness is the way it creates men like Kerr Avon, Blake’s friend and foil. Initially, Avon seems to be the Spock of the series; he’s actually the Kirk, but it’s a little more complicated and sad than that.

Avon's first appearance; a less-than-imposing computer scientist desperate to cut a deal for his life.

Avon is the sort of character — antisocial, cynical, what TV Tropes calls a “Deadpan Snarker” — who becomes a fan favorite. This sexy archetype is played, however, with unusual realism. His disdain for humanity is not cute. He really doesn’t get along with the other characters. They critique him as crushingly as he critiques them, and often more aptly — he calls Vila stupid, which Vila plainly isn’t; Vila tells Avon he doesn’t understand people at all, which is true.

Avon becomes increasingly powerful as the series wears on. He rises from crew techie to Blake’s second-in-command, and eventually becomes the leader of the group. As his power grows, he acquires more trappings of sci-fi badassery — leather, studs, shooting people, kissing people who didn’t ask to be kissed.

Yet Avon can’t pass for an action hero. His basic appearance of fragility plays a role; difficult to be Han Solo when you look so clamped and glum. But so does the actual evidence of the eyes: despite his insistence that he ought to be in charge, Avon really takes any opportunity to follow, right up until the moment when he finally collapses into the captain’s chair. When someone else else shows even the slightest inclination to lead, Avon insults him ritually and then retreats to his corner, where he tinkers quietly with machines. He also invents new defenses for the ship. And meets intelligent rocks. And pursues personal vendettas. And solves murders. And plays board games, though he’s not alone in that; the crew of the Liberator spend a lot of time playing board games. Sometimes Avon seems to be the only crew member who does anything. Look at a first- or second-season battle sequence sometime. Dude is always running around. He works at least two stations. Blake just sits there.

And one of his last. I wish he were dual-wielding, but that's Tarrant's hand. One of the many great things about Paul Darrow in this role is that his expression is the same.

So there’s a sad, terrible irony in Avon. Leave him alone, and he’ll be a useful and rather happy man. But he lives in a dystopian space opera, and in a world split between the regimented/brutal Federation and the chaotic/brutal criminal world, there are only so many ways to get securely left alone– all of which are closed to him. There’s no way he’ll get anywhere in the Federation, which runs purely on charisma, glamour, birth, and social connections. And though the criminal world is better, it’s still rather similar, at least in that you need a personality gimmick to get anywhere. And what could Avon’s gimmick be? He’s not empathetic or humble enough to be a likable clown like Vila. He’s not politically engaged or martyrdom-prone enough to become a revolutionary like Blake or a zealot like Cally; he lacks Gan’s inoffensive nature, Jenna’s hard charm, Dayna’s or Soolin’s prowess in war.

What Avon is is subtle, frustrated, computerlike. His iconic first-season line is “I have never understood why it should be necessary to become irrational in order to prove that you care, or, indeed, why it should be necessary to prove it at all.” People with that kind of brain don’t do well in a world in which everybody is shouting.

So he becomes a brute, and a massively unsubtle brute. I’m not saying he’s a better brute because he has an excuse. On the contrary, he’s much worse; because he was not born a brute — because he was born a rather sensitive and retiring man, and learned brutality by imitation, out of desperation, at an early age — he becomes unstable and dangerous, and fucks it up for everybody. He’s too tone-deaf to brute right.

Blurry shot of the cast talking it out over coffee. This kind of thing happened a lot. Once they had margaritas.

In this way, he’s as odd a duck as Blake the rebel engineer: Avon the killer/programmer, a poseur among badasses, who becomes the biggest badass of all through sheer force of recognition that badassery is the only game in town, and promptly implodes, helpless, desperate. Cue cheery fourth-season end-credits theme.

And as above, there are a million reasons why a lot of this is accidental, inconsistent, and the happy result of sloppy writing, but that’s life. It might involve recycled monster costumes from Doctor Who, but it’s still a tragedy.

Advertisement

9 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. labingi said, on May 30, 2010 at 10:39 pm

    One example of the Federation’s fundamental wastefulness is the way it creates men like Kerr Avon…

    This is beautifully put. Your analysis of Avon is not quite like any I’ve ever read, and I will be chewing on it for a while. I love how you express the ironies and inconsistencies and goodness and badness of the show in general.

    I disagree that the galactic war didn’t have much day-to-day effect. I think it had a lot, but it also had a lot of writers who didn’t really understand that the war had happened or when or why or quite what it was, resulting in great unevenness, especially in timeline. From S2 to S3, it looked like the war took at most a few days (the Liberator crew never changed clothes). Later writers treated like a decade-long catastrophe.

    But the repercussions were there: Servalan’s shrunken sphere of power (the only legitimate reason for her more intimate villainy in S3-4), the new Fed uniforms of hypothetical coolness, the increased use of drugs to subjugate the masses, the replacement of corrupt career politicians with corrupt career soldier thugs. That we don’t clearly see the change in the daily lives of the Liberator’s crew is, I think, due to the loss of Blake, which overshadows all other changes. If Blake had remained, the sociopolitical turn might have been much more evident.

  2. criticalfailing said, on May 31, 2010 at 4:39 am

    That’s true. They didn’t talk about Blake much, leading to the unfortunate feeling that the writers forgot who he was, too — which makes it hard for me to entirely feel that it was Blake’s loss that overshadowed the war. But all that has plausible character-based explanations, especially given that the appearance of Dayna and Tarrant disrupted the process of mourning Blake and complicated any efforts to make searching for him the crew’s primary purpose.

    It’s also true that the writers were trying, just not usually in the same ways. I guess part of that was budget, too — the fact that they could only afford to send the Liberator/Scorpio crew to isolated worlds with a single research station or some such; hard to portray larger social changes that way, no matter how much it adds to the series’ lonely atmosphere. (Blake’s 7 is often a better take on “Forbidden Planet” than Star Trek was, despite more overt influence of FP on Star Trek. It’s all in the Acting.)

    I love B7′s attempts to show populated worlds without hiring masses of extras or building a city, though — the weird stadium on Auron, the escalators in Warlord, and that empty convention hall with Servalan’s big face on the screen. Or when Vila went to that planet of organ thieves; they managed to imply a big city just through implied contrast with what he’d been experiencing beforehand, and through good costuming of the few citizens we saw.

  3. Bookwyrme said, on June 5, 2010 at 8:30 pm

    Interesting analysis! Makes me miss Blake’s 7 again!

  4. Solarfall said, on March 2, 2011 at 11:42 pm

    I came over here rather late, so you might deem my comment as irrelevant by now, but I just wanted to express my gratitude for for writing up this excellent psychological analysis of Blake’s 7′s leading characters.

    Blake’s 7 has always been my favourite SF-series ever exactly for its fantastic, multilayered characters and their at times heartwarming, and at just as many times (or rather – much more), heartbreaking and gut-wrenching interactions. Is there anyone who can really keep a dry eye at Avon’s apparent sliding down into complete paranoia and subsequent madness, as he loses about everyone who he loves along the way – quite often caused by his own mistakes and misinterpretations? I recently rewatched the entire series again after 30 years, and I still can’t…

    Also, thanks a lot for giving the Blake character the credits he deserves. I’ve seen too many ‘he’s a tosser’ kind-of comments floating around the net, apparently from folks who didn’t manage to understand the character at all. The main point they seem to be missing is that without Blake, Avon is immediately prone to descent into ‘mental darkness’ – Blake is the guy that understands him, kindly refusing to actually react to Avon’s (nasty) words, but getting the intention of his words very well – that he might well be the only person around that Avon actually has a huge respect for. Call it a very intense ‘love-or-hate’-relationship, fact is that Avon can’t do without Blake, reason why he keeps on searching for him.
    Unfortunately, when they finally get to meet each other again, Avon is so far stuck in his trigger-happy paranoia that the terrible end of the series has become inevitable. What a sad ending… but beautiful, as only true works of art can be. ‘Gothic’ in the true romantic sense of the word. This, imho, actually comes close to the novels of Mary Shelley and and Bram Stoker!

    I have the utmost respect for all of the actors who managed to bring their characters to life so well – not just Paul Darrow and Gareth Thomas, don’t rule out Michael Keating or Jacqueline Pierce either. Perhaps they all did a little bit TOO well, as their careers after the series didn’t seem to draw all that much attention anymore. They remained to be Avon, Blake, Vila, and Servalan forever since 1982…

    I hope you don’t mind if I post a link to your analysis in my own blog once in a while, just because you found the words that I could never do… just freakin’ awesome!

    • criticalfailing said, on March 3, 2011 at 12:14 am

      Thanks for this comment; it put a big smile on my face which may not go away for a while. I love the Shelley/Stoker comparison; it suits both the mythic tragedy and the unpredictable, often treacherously meandering path the story takes to get there, and also the fact that it’s quite campy — but this adds to, rather than detracting from, the mythic atmosphere.

      Yes, I wish Blake would get a fairer treatment – Gareth Thomas, like all of the main actors on this show (oh, Jacqueline Pierce, how I love thee), plays his role with an intelligence that transcends rough or repetitive writing and allows great writing its full effect. The whole elaborate subtext of Blake and Avon’s pained, lacerating friendship and even love (I don’t slash them, personally, but either way I think they love each other) could’ve been lost in less careful hands.

      I don’t remember if I said so in the post, but I’m actually pretty new to B7 (saw it for the first time on DVD last year) and I’m pretty sure it’ll still work after 30 years, too.

      Where do you blog, if I may ask, and are you on LJ/Dreamwidth?

      • Solarfall said, on March 3, 2011 at 2:23 am

        I feel very honoured by your reply! Can’t agree with you more, I’m afraid. Or maybe, not at all. :)

        I’m a so-called ‘oldie’ myself, I first witnessed Blakes’7 back in the 1970-1980′s when I was a very young teenager – and yes, I fell in LOVE for the first time of my life (with Avon, I have to admit. Fortunately, I caught a like-wise character in RL, LOL!). I had no idea what was happening to me at that time… it just *mesmerized* me. I have dismissed about any other SF-series that ever came beyond, haha.

        Rewatching the series recently just made me find out that I wasn’t so silly as I thought I were at that time. :-)

        I am on LJ, I have barely ever posted on this particular subject, as it is… too dear to me. Would you believe that? I hope you will. :-)

        I am a massive alternative/progrock/gothic rock fan, and you’ll might find yourself surprised at how many of my posts actually relate to the dark atmosphere of Blakes’7.
        Oh, I am a scientist, and a lawyer as well. As well as a semi-pro Bridge Player.

        I’d be very happy to be able to friend you at my LJ, which is over here: http://solarfallsrealm.livejournal.com/

        Pleased to meet you, hope to see you over there! :-D

      • criticalfailing said, on March 3, 2011 at 5:02 am

        I am on LJ, I have barely ever posted on this particular subject, as it is… too dear to me. Would you believe that?

        Despite my endless discourse on things that interest me (dear and otherwise), I understand what you mean.

        You remind me of a friend from Morrissey fandom, both in terms of interests and manner of speech. Just friended you; very pleased to meet you as well. :) I haven’t got nearly as interesting a set of day jobs (I just proofread court documents and occasionally write copy)…

    • criticalfailing said, on March 3, 2011 at 12:23 am

      PS on Blake and Avon — their troubles almost play like a much, much darker version of Star Wars; the hero meets the mentor, but the mentor vanishes before the training is complete, leaving the hero in a volatile, needy state, having been taught to open his eyes but not to interpret what he sees.

      • Solarfall said, on March 3, 2011 at 2:13 am

        That’s pretty much SPOT-ON! :)


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.